So that's it huh? No more ragging in our colleges. Life on campus will never be the same. Another great tradition killed because we dont keep our limits. Generations will now grow up without this priceless experience.
I favor the Supreme Court decision because ragging has been abused beyond limits. But I still believe we need it in our country. It is the only way to foster mental growth in adolescents. Think about the life of the teens in our schools or junior colleges (11th and 12th). Wake up, study, go to school or college, attend private tuitions, finish homework, study, sleep....Unlike other countries where students work parttime and pay their tutions, our students are encouraged to focus on studies and that alone. No games, no sports, only studies. These poor beings have no interaction with the society. They move in groups of fellow students, usually of the same caliber. In sum, there's no attention paid to personality development, and consequently there is none.
Ragging builds character. When ragged, students are forced to come out of their shells or comfort zones; they are forced to do things they normally avoid, which is a critical step in mental growth. Ragging helps shed inhibitions and fears and builds confidence. For example, a student develops humility when he is forced to address a senior as 'sir'. This also keeps the 'toppers' down-to-earth by making them realize they are just as normal as the next person. Similarly, when a student is forced to approach a girl with a rose, he overcomes his fear of failure. He realizes that getting rejected or snubbed by a girl is not so bad after all. It doesnt kill you or anything. In fact, he learns how to do it better when has has to do it for himself. Even when a bunch of students are forced to strip down to their undies, although distressing initially, it makes them feel more comfortable with their bodies. For those with a good physique, it builds confidence, and for those without one, it pushes them to start working out. And you cant deny that ragging develops a naughty side in even the most studious and sincere students, without which they will be terrible bores. After the initial terror of ragging subsides, it paves way for great networking opportunities. Imagine the number of people that would not meet if there was no ragging. Surely such acquiantances wil be useful one time or the other.
Banning ragging is not the end. It's the beginning. Educational institutions must now find other effective ways to foster psychological growth in students. There should be more opportunities for students to socialize. And herein lies the rub. Regardless of how many such opportunities are offered, students can pass them up. An introvert would be too shy to attend, a rich student might feel it below his standards, a studious one thinks this is a waste of time and so on. And this is why ragging worked so well: it wasnt optional, it was compulsory. Whether you liked it or not, you had to step forward and follow orders. And I dont think our educational system is anywhere close to finding a safer alternative to ragging.
So now that we've killed ragging, be prepared for a generation of socially challenged and psychologically imbalanced geniuses that will soon pour out of our colleges.
Friday, May 18, 2007
Monday, May 14, 2007
Generation Storm!
I wonder why we grow up thinking we dont need to learn once we pass out of college? Is it our rich tradition of government jobs that involve anything but work? I am appalled that we, for generations, looked at a government job as the ultimate prize in life.
Anyway, the point I am making is that learning starts when you pass out of college and step into the real world. I am not saying formal education is easy. On the contrary, it is getting more difficult and rigorous by the day. The sad part though is that these rigors do not mirror reality. Students are evaluated by their ability to cram mathematical equations, but now how those can be used to solve real-life problems. How many students learning binomial theorem, trigonometry or calculus in class 12 know where they will be used in real life? I certainly didnt and that was one of the reasons I hated math. It was so difficult, and I had no idea where in hell would I need it.
Most business schools adopt a case-study based approach. The professor lectures on a topic for about 15-30 minutes and then discusses a case. For example, a lecture on failed leaders might involve a discussion on India's world cup performance. Students are encouraged to offer their views and counterviews. Of course, for students to make sensible viewpoints they need to know more about the topic than what was covered in the 30-min lecture. And that's precisely why this model works so well: students prepare for a class. And that is unheard of in the traditional model, where even lecturers make up crap on the spot.
Case-studies work on two levels. One, they immediately establish the relevance of a topic by linking it to a real-life situation. And there is no better motivator to learning than a strong relevance. Two, they offer students a chance to participate, or in other words, students learn actively. Further, the discussion gives rise to several interesting and unconventional views, and builds communication skills and confidence among students.
There is nothing new about this model. Like I said, this is the preferred approach in most business schools. And the concepts of relevance and engagement are cornerstones for trainings developed for the workplace. Why then can we not use this model in formal education where it will pay the most dividends? Imagine a generation that grows up learning how trigonometry is used to calculate the angle of flight take off or how magnets store large amounts of data in computers. Such a generation will not only be prepared to handle the real world, they will take it by storm.
When will we see Generation Storm?
Anyway, the point I am making is that learning starts when you pass out of college and step into the real world. I am not saying formal education is easy. On the contrary, it is getting more difficult and rigorous by the day. The sad part though is that these rigors do not mirror reality. Students are evaluated by their ability to cram mathematical equations, but now how those can be used to solve real-life problems. How many students learning binomial theorem, trigonometry or calculus in class 12 know where they will be used in real life? I certainly didnt and that was one of the reasons I hated math. It was so difficult, and I had no idea where in hell would I need it.
Most business schools adopt a case-study based approach. The professor lectures on a topic for about 15-30 minutes and then discusses a case. For example, a lecture on failed leaders might involve a discussion on India's world cup performance. Students are encouraged to offer their views and counterviews. Of course, for students to make sensible viewpoints they need to know more about the topic than what was covered in the 30-min lecture. And that's precisely why this model works so well: students prepare for a class. And that is unheard of in the traditional model, where even lecturers make up crap on the spot.
Case-studies work on two levels. One, they immediately establish the relevance of a topic by linking it to a real-life situation. And there is no better motivator to learning than a strong relevance. Two, they offer students a chance to participate, or in other words, students learn actively. Further, the discussion gives rise to several interesting and unconventional views, and builds communication skills and confidence among students.
There is nothing new about this model. Like I said, this is the preferred approach in most business schools. And the concepts of relevance and engagement are cornerstones for trainings developed for the workplace. Why then can we not use this model in formal education where it will pay the most dividends? Imagine a generation that grows up learning how trigonometry is used to calculate the angle of flight take off or how magnets store large amounts of data in computers. Such a generation will not only be prepared to handle the real world, they will take it by storm.
When will we see Generation Storm?
Thursday, May 3, 2007
The Iraq War
I am not a Bush supporter, nor am I his worst critic. But, my sympathies are strongly with the President in the matter of the Iraq war. Several damning revelations since the start of war, most notably the CIA's intelligence failure, have caused not only Americans but people around the world to question the decision. In fact, the Republican party paid a heavy price in the mid-term elections held in October 2006. With the perfect 20/20 hindsight that we all possess, we can now say the war was a mistake. Even Bush, in the inner recesses of his soul, must agree.
But, what was it like in 2003? As the President of the most powerful nation on earth, but one that was attacked by terrorists on its own soil, with another rogue nation threatening to wipe you off the face of earth, what are your options? Sit back, relax and wait to see if Saddam makes a move? And if Saddam had nothing to hide, why was he so reluctant to allow UN inspections? Maybe, diplomacy was an option, but I doubt Saddam was interested in assuaging the anxities of the US. He probably relished being a thorn in Bush's posterior. So, I guess Bush decided to err on the side of caution.
Unfortunately for Bush, it turned out Saddam never had any WMDs. Or he somehow got rid of them. I am not familiar with the theory that the sole purpose of the war was to gain control of Iraq's oil resources. I wont comment on it, but I will say this: In this day and age, it is almost impossible to capture a sovereign nation and control its natural resources. Anyway, in my opinion, here's where the US faltered: after attacking Iraq and capturing Saddam, the US forces should have retreated. Bush has no right to use the taxpayer's money to try and establish democracy in Iraq. The US has done its part by liberating millions of Iraqis from the dictatorial rule of Saddam. Too bad if the Iraqis cant make something out of this. If the Iraqis dont have a leader that can unite all the warring factions and provide decisive leadership, then I guess they deserve to be caught in the throes of a civil war.
But, what was it like in 2003? As the President of the most powerful nation on earth, but one that was attacked by terrorists on its own soil, with another rogue nation threatening to wipe you off the face of earth, what are your options? Sit back, relax and wait to see if Saddam makes a move? And if Saddam had nothing to hide, why was he so reluctant to allow UN inspections? Maybe, diplomacy was an option, but I doubt Saddam was interested in assuaging the anxities of the US. He probably relished being a thorn in Bush's posterior. So, I guess Bush decided to err on the side of caution.
Unfortunately for Bush, it turned out Saddam never had any WMDs. Or he somehow got rid of them. I am not familiar with the theory that the sole purpose of the war was to gain control of Iraq's oil resources. I wont comment on it, but I will say this: In this day and age, it is almost impossible to capture a sovereign nation and control its natural resources. Anyway, in my opinion, here's where the US faltered: after attacking Iraq and capturing Saddam, the US forces should have retreated. Bush has no right to use the taxpayer's money to try and establish democracy in Iraq. The US has done its part by liberating millions of Iraqis from the dictatorial rule of Saddam. Too bad if the Iraqis cant make something out of this. If the Iraqis dont have a leader that can unite all the warring factions and provide decisive leadership, then I guess they deserve to be caught in the throes of a civil war.
Wednesday, May 2, 2007
World's Most Powerless Person
The American President is easily the world’s most powerful person although Osama Bin Laden is giving him a run for his money. But, do you wonder who the world’s most powerless person is? For obvious reasons, I am keeping ordinary citizens like you and me out of this race. And to make the search meaningful, I’ll limit my quest to national leaders, and in that, to people in positions that at least have a semblance of power. This will automatically eliminate choices like the President of India, the Prime Minister of Pakistan and Iraq and the likes.
You should have guessed the winner by now. Yes, it’s our dear Prime Minister, Mr. Manmohan Singh. I don’t think there’s even a close second. I mean no disrespect to Mr. Singh. On the contrary, I believe he’s the kind of Prime Minster we’ve been desperately searching for. However, a Prime Minster also needs power, and that is where Mr. Singh lacks.
Mr. Singh was not the preferred choice for this position. In fact, he was never in contention until Mr. Sharad Pawar caused a furor over Mrs. Sonia Gandhi’s foreign origin. Mr. Singh has Mr. Pawar to thank as much as Mrs. Gandhi for his elevation as the leader of Republic India. Sadly, Mr. Singh was not chosen for his financial acumen or political wisdom. It was his image of being a soft-liner that won him the job, and on top of that, I don’t think he had any say over who got into his Cabinet. Even with that, if the Congress had secured a majority in Lok Sabha by itself, Mr. Singh would have had control over how his Government is run, despite Mrs. Gandhi holding the remote that is. Now, he has to work his way with the likes of Mr. Laloo Prasad Yadav, and some of the political allies and supporters of the UPA don’t even belong in the same country. Yes, I refer to the Communist parties. The CPM and CPI have nothing in common with the Congress except their shared hatred of the BJP: Good enough to win an election and form a Government, but hardly sufficient to formulate progressive policies. (It is some consolation that Buddadeb Bhattacharya, Chief Minister of West Bengal, subscribes to a more realistic view of the industrial situation in India.)
So, Mr. Singh finds himself in an unenviable position, where he has the power to sign any law that he wants, but the Congress has tied his hands and the Left keeps hiding the pen.
You should have guessed the winner by now. Yes, it’s our dear Prime Minister, Mr. Manmohan Singh. I don’t think there’s even a close second. I mean no disrespect to Mr. Singh. On the contrary, I believe he’s the kind of Prime Minster we’ve been desperately searching for. However, a Prime Minster also needs power, and that is where Mr. Singh lacks.
Mr. Singh was not the preferred choice for this position. In fact, he was never in contention until Mr. Sharad Pawar caused a furor over Mrs. Sonia Gandhi’s foreign origin. Mr. Singh has Mr. Pawar to thank as much as Mrs. Gandhi for his elevation as the leader of Republic India. Sadly, Mr. Singh was not chosen for his financial acumen or political wisdom. It was his image of being a soft-liner that won him the job, and on top of that, I don’t think he had any say over who got into his Cabinet. Even with that, if the Congress had secured a majority in Lok Sabha by itself, Mr. Singh would have had control over how his Government is run, despite Mrs. Gandhi holding the remote that is. Now, he has to work his way with the likes of Mr. Laloo Prasad Yadav, and some of the political allies and supporters of the UPA don’t even belong in the same country. Yes, I refer to the Communist parties. The CPM and CPI have nothing in common with the Congress except their shared hatred of the BJP: Good enough to win an election and form a Government, but hardly sufficient to formulate progressive policies. (It is some consolation that Buddadeb Bhattacharya, Chief Minister of West Bengal, subscribes to a more realistic view of the industrial situation in India.)
So, Mr. Singh finds himself in an unenviable position, where he has the power to sign any law that he wants, but the Congress has tied his hands and the Left keeps hiding the pen.
Monday, April 30, 2007
10 Tips to succeeding at the workplace
Visit any bookstore, and you will find several books on this matter. However, I feel most advice is targeted at mid-career professionals, and not so much the beginner. And the advice in this post will be particularly beneficial for beginners.What follows is from personal experience and home grown wisdom, but I assure you, these have worked for me. If you like what you read, I recommend you print this list and post it on your cubicle wall. You don’t have to keep working on these every minute, but if you get that feeling of your career hitting a brick wall, this list might give you some ideas.1. Don’t hate your job
This will influence your career more than the following 9 tips combined, so pay attention. We end up in our jobs for various reasons. Maybe, you needed the job to support your family, or you dropped out of college and had to survive. Even if your job is not in line with your aspirations, even if you have to work nights and weekends and cant find time to party, even if you did not get the promotion or raise you deserved, do not hate your job. You don’t have to start loving it, but I want you to see how you can use it to your advantage. For example, how can your current experience help you with your future plans? Can you make some connections that will be useful in the future? Get to actively know everyone in your team and beyond. Can you learn something from your coworkers? Does your employer have policies that reimburse you for continuing education?
Even if you absolutely hate your job, do not let this affect your attitude. Be a professional. An opportunity that interests you might come up, and you don’t want your boss to disregard you because you were not professional. And, hating your job is no excuse for poor performance. You are only deluding yourself by thinking so, and the sooner you snap out of it, the better. If you really feel stifled in your job, just get a different one.
2. Look at the big picture
How does your company make money? Does it sell products or services? What does the market look like and who are your major clients? Is this an emerging market or an existing one? Is the market on the rise or is it declining? Understand how new developments can impact your organization. For example, if you are working for a company that makes DVDs, you should know what HD-DVD and BLURAY are, how they might affect the DVD market.
Find out who owns your company and their track record. If they have started businesses before and failed, that might be a red flag. It does not mean they will fail this time as well, but you would want to pay close attention to where your company is headed. Doing this homework also gives a better feel of how you fit into the overall scheme of things. You can decide whether you want to continue in this field or switch careers. It also prepares you for nasty surprises like losing a client or your company being sold or taken over. You won’t know the exact events beforehand, but you will be much more open to these possibilities.
3. Look at your organization
Understand how your organization is structured. What are its different lines of business? Is there a department that does the kind of work you want to do? Find out how you can transition to that department.
Find out the number of layers between you and the CEO. If this number is greater than 7, this typically indicates bureaucracy. In other words, your bosses pay a lot of attention to their designation. And how many employees report to a typical manager? If it is more than 10, your organization might have a flat structure. Feel free to talk to other experienced employees or even your manager on how your organization “works”.
4. Annual performance review: Annual means year-long not once a year.
Most of us, me included, fall into the trap of collecting performance data when it is time to fill out evaluation forms. Like I said, almost all of us do this, so the ineptitude of the entire population negates any significant adverse effect to you. But, look at the opportunity you have; if you pay attention to it all year-long, and constantly work towards exceeding them, you are automatically a top-performer. And you won’t have to get into messy arguments about missing data or incorrect grades.
Of course, I assume you know what you will be graded on. If you don’t, ask to see a list of criteria on which your performance will be evaluated. Understand how these metrics translate to the actual job you are doing, and if you have any concerns, bring them up right away. Many organizations have a standard appraisal form for a particular role. However, the job functions of this role might vary across departments or projects. If you think the evaluation criteria are not relevant to what you are doing, then discuss this with your manager.
5. You be your judge
Trust me, the temptation to be part of the office crowd, the need to feel accepted, can be overpowering. It is alright to gel with your coworkers and be friendly with them. However, don’t let their opinion of you dictate your actions. For example, if you are in a meeting and you did not understand what was just said, then ask. Don’t feel that your coworkers will take you for an idiot. It all ties back to your annual review. If you think you need to know something that will affect your performance, and consequently your raise, then find it out regardless of what it takes. Don’t lose out on opportunities trying to please your coworkers.
In some cases, however, if pleasing a coworker by letting go an opportunity might help in the long run, do it. Again, don’t worry that others will brand you political. I am not asking you to be manipulative, but if it is a fair give-n-take, go for it.
6. You be your boss' judge
Most importantly, don’t judge your boss by what your coworkers' think of him or her. Figuring out your boss is a delicate matter, and you alone should do it. Bosses can be smart, stupid, smartly stupid or stupidly smart. Get a feel for what your coworkers think about your boss, but form your own impression of him or her based on your interactions. So long as your boss does not breathe down your neck everyday and gives you a fair performance evaluation, you should have no problems.
If some of your boss' decisions don’t make sense, try and understand the underlying motive. Is your boss trying to prove something to his superiors? Are these decisions linked to your boss' performance goals? Figure out these links and help him or her when it matters. You will win yourself a friend and can count on the favor being returned. And again, don’t care about what your coworkers have to say. They are not the ones giving you a promotion or raise.
7. Manage your time
I cannot overemphasize the importance of time management. If you are working a 9-6 job that does end at 6, you can skip this tip. However, if you are part of the majority that works late into the night and usually over weekends, then start by accepting that it is your fault and your fault alone. Yes, give it a moment to sink in.
Before I even talk about workload, let me draw your attention to some thing else that keeps you late at work. How much time do you spend on tea breaks, checking email and other personal websites, water-cooler conversations with coworkers, on the phone with a friend, etc? Do you deduct this time when you say you are working 12 hours?
Even if you are genuinely over-burdened, you are responsible for not bringing that up with your manager. If you already know the work assigned will need you to work late, let your manager know. You don’t have to refuse, but use the opportunity to showcase your commitment and loyalty to the organization. Even if you don’t have a choice of working late, don’t crib about it. No manager likes to have an employee that is uncooperative.
8. Negotiate, tactfully.
Inevitably, you will end up in situations where you disagree with what your boss or coworkers think or vice-versa. If not handled correctly, such situations can rapidly deteriorate into permanent hostilities. Even if such hostilities won’t cause you any harm, you should still avoid them. One of the hallmarks of success at the workplaces is your ability to influence people around you, and negotiation is the most potent weapon to have in your armory. Disagreements, by their nature, are win-lose situations: if one party wins, the other loses. Negotiation is a technique to turn disagreements into win-wins.
When you have a disagreement, do not immediately discard the demands and concerns of the other person. Instead, look at the situation from their point of view and understand their motivation. This will give you a better feel for the concenrs and insecurities of the other party. You can then use this knowledge to reach an amicable settlement without necessarily compromising on your position. As an example, let's say your manager wants you to work on a weekend, but you don’t want to. Instead of refusing point blank, take a moment to understand why you are being asked to work on a weekend? Is it because the manager wants to make sure your team meets a deadline? If so, can you think of an alternative to meet the deadline without working on the weekend? Are you okay with putting in a few extra hours the following week to cover up?
The key is to view disagreements as opportunities, and not as unpleasant problems. Learn to smooth talk your way into getting what you want. Try not to compromise your position as much as you can, but if you need to make some concessions, do it. It’s better to take a few losses now than to have a relationship permanently scarred. Not only might you have to work with this other person in the future, he or she might perpetuate negative impressions about you.
9. Build an image
You are a consistent top-performer and your team members just adore you. But, what about the people that don’t interact with you? What impression are they forming about you by watching you about the office? What’s your boss’ perception? This might sound shallow, but you do really need to maintain an image - an image of confidence and professionalism.
Work on your English. Expand your vocabulary so you are not repeating the same sentence structure and buzz words in every meeting. Don’t show off your language skills all the time; you will only disgust your coworkers. Instead, give a glimpse of it every now and then. Learn to write crisp and clear emails that are to the point.
Dress well. Take tips from your close friends on what suits you and what don’t. Have a neat hairdo. Go for an exotic haircut, if you want, but make sure it is well maintained. Shave everyday, or at least every other day, and if you have a beard and moustache, make sure they are neatly trimmed. Look at photos of yourself and see what you can do to make your appearance more pleasing? Do you wear glasses that are straight out of a 70s movie? What about your shoes? Are they polished? You dont have to dress up like a celebrity, but you should look smart and sharp.
I cant speak much for women, but I have two pieces of advice. One, look at how other women at your work dress, and try to fit in. For example, if your coworkers are into jeans and tops, or western-style formals, don’t turn up everyday in salwar suits. You will stick out like a sore thumb. If you are not comfortable with contemporary fashion, go for chic ethnic dresses. Number two, never repeat your dresses in the same week, and never ever wear the same dress on consecutive days – even if you’ve washed them. This is true for the guys too.
10. Learn from failures
It’s okay to make mistakes, but it’s important you learn from them. Don’t always stick to the tried and tested. Instead, try out new ideas. Fear of failure is the most common factor that inhibits growth. Conquer it. Once you have failed and bounced back, you wont dread it anymore. In fact, it adds to your confidence, and you will enjoy living on the edge.
If you don’t believe me, just look at sports. Even the greatest athletes are not perfect. They have all lost games in their career. They have weaknesses that are exploited from time to time. But most importantly, they learn from their losses. And that what makes them great.
There are many other things you can do to get ahead, but if you must start somewhere, this is a pretty good place. Do leave a comment to let me know what you think.
This will influence your career more than the following 9 tips combined, so pay attention. We end up in our jobs for various reasons. Maybe, you needed the job to support your family, or you dropped out of college and had to survive. Even if your job is not in line with your aspirations, even if you have to work nights and weekends and cant find time to party, even if you did not get the promotion or raise you deserved, do not hate your job. You don’t have to start loving it, but I want you to see how you can use it to your advantage. For example, how can your current experience help you with your future plans? Can you make some connections that will be useful in the future? Get to actively know everyone in your team and beyond. Can you learn something from your coworkers? Does your employer have policies that reimburse you for continuing education?
Even if you absolutely hate your job, do not let this affect your attitude. Be a professional. An opportunity that interests you might come up, and you don’t want your boss to disregard you because you were not professional. And, hating your job is no excuse for poor performance. You are only deluding yourself by thinking so, and the sooner you snap out of it, the better. If you really feel stifled in your job, just get a different one.
2. Look at the big picture
How does your company make money? Does it sell products or services? What does the market look like and who are your major clients? Is this an emerging market or an existing one? Is the market on the rise or is it declining? Understand how new developments can impact your organization. For example, if you are working for a company that makes DVDs, you should know what HD-DVD and BLURAY are, how they might affect the DVD market.
Find out who owns your company and their track record. If they have started businesses before and failed, that might be a red flag. It does not mean they will fail this time as well, but you would want to pay close attention to where your company is headed. Doing this homework also gives a better feel of how you fit into the overall scheme of things. You can decide whether you want to continue in this field or switch careers. It also prepares you for nasty surprises like losing a client or your company being sold or taken over. You won’t know the exact events beforehand, but you will be much more open to these possibilities.
3. Look at your organization
Understand how your organization is structured. What are its different lines of business? Is there a department that does the kind of work you want to do? Find out how you can transition to that department.
Find out the number of layers between you and the CEO. If this number is greater than 7, this typically indicates bureaucracy. In other words, your bosses pay a lot of attention to their designation. And how many employees report to a typical manager? If it is more than 10, your organization might have a flat structure. Feel free to talk to other experienced employees or even your manager on how your organization “works”.
4. Annual performance review: Annual means year-long not once a year.
Most of us, me included, fall into the trap of collecting performance data when it is time to fill out evaluation forms. Like I said, almost all of us do this, so the ineptitude of the entire population negates any significant adverse effect to you. But, look at the opportunity you have; if you pay attention to it all year-long, and constantly work towards exceeding them, you are automatically a top-performer. And you won’t have to get into messy arguments about missing data or incorrect grades.
Of course, I assume you know what you will be graded on. If you don’t, ask to see a list of criteria on which your performance will be evaluated. Understand how these metrics translate to the actual job you are doing, and if you have any concerns, bring them up right away. Many organizations have a standard appraisal form for a particular role. However, the job functions of this role might vary across departments or projects. If you think the evaluation criteria are not relevant to what you are doing, then discuss this with your manager.
5. You be your judge
Trust me, the temptation to be part of the office crowd, the need to feel accepted, can be overpowering. It is alright to gel with your coworkers and be friendly with them. However, don’t let their opinion of you dictate your actions. For example, if you are in a meeting and you did not understand what was just said, then ask. Don’t feel that your coworkers will take you for an idiot. It all ties back to your annual review. If you think you need to know something that will affect your performance, and consequently your raise, then find it out regardless of what it takes. Don’t lose out on opportunities trying to please your coworkers.
In some cases, however, if pleasing a coworker by letting go an opportunity might help in the long run, do it. Again, don’t worry that others will brand you political. I am not asking you to be manipulative, but if it is a fair give-n-take, go for it.
6. You be your boss' judge
Most importantly, don’t judge your boss by what your coworkers' think of him or her. Figuring out your boss is a delicate matter, and you alone should do it. Bosses can be smart, stupid, smartly stupid or stupidly smart. Get a feel for what your coworkers think about your boss, but form your own impression of him or her based on your interactions. So long as your boss does not breathe down your neck everyday and gives you a fair performance evaluation, you should have no problems.
If some of your boss' decisions don’t make sense, try and understand the underlying motive. Is your boss trying to prove something to his superiors? Are these decisions linked to your boss' performance goals? Figure out these links and help him or her when it matters. You will win yourself a friend and can count on the favor being returned. And again, don’t care about what your coworkers have to say. They are not the ones giving you a promotion or raise.
7. Manage your time
I cannot overemphasize the importance of time management. If you are working a 9-6 job that does end at 6, you can skip this tip. However, if you are part of the majority that works late into the night and usually over weekends, then start by accepting that it is your fault and your fault alone. Yes, give it a moment to sink in.
Before I even talk about workload, let me draw your attention to some thing else that keeps you late at work. How much time do you spend on tea breaks, checking email and other personal websites, water-cooler conversations with coworkers, on the phone with a friend, etc? Do you deduct this time when you say you are working 12 hours?
Even if you are genuinely over-burdened, you are responsible for not bringing that up with your manager. If you already know the work assigned will need you to work late, let your manager know. You don’t have to refuse, but use the opportunity to showcase your commitment and loyalty to the organization. Even if you don’t have a choice of working late, don’t crib about it. No manager likes to have an employee that is uncooperative.
8. Negotiate, tactfully.
Inevitably, you will end up in situations where you disagree with what your boss or coworkers think or vice-versa. If not handled correctly, such situations can rapidly deteriorate into permanent hostilities. Even if such hostilities won’t cause you any harm, you should still avoid them. One of the hallmarks of success at the workplaces is your ability to influence people around you, and negotiation is the most potent weapon to have in your armory. Disagreements, by their nature, are win-lose situations: if one party wins, the other loses. Negotiation is a technique to turn disagreements into win-wins.
When you have a disagreement, do not immediately discard the demands and concerns of the other person. Instead, look at the situation from their point of view and understand their motivation. This will give you a better feel for the concenrs and insecurities of the other party. You can then use this knowledge to reach an amicable settlement without necessarily compromising on your position. As an example, let's say your manager wants you to work on a weekend, but you don’t want to. Instead of refusing point blank, take a moment to understand why you are being asked to work on a weekend? Is it because the manager wants to make sure your team meets a deadline? If so, can you think of an alternative to meet the deadline without working on the weekend? Are you okay with putting in a few extra hours the following week to cover up?
The key is to view disagreements as opportunities, and not as unpleasant problems. Learn to smooth talk your way into getting what you want. Try not to compromise your position as much as you can, but if you need to make some concessions, do it. It’s better to take a few losses now than to have a relationship permanently scarred. Not only might you have to work with this other person in the future, he or she might perpetuate negative impressions about you.
9. Build an image
You are a consistent top-performer and your team members just adore you. But, what about the people that don’t interact with you? What impression are they forming about you by watching you about the office? What’s your boss’ perception? This might sound shallow, but you do really need to maintain an image - an image of confidence and professionalism.
Work on your English. Expand your vocabulary so you are not repeating the same sentence structure and buzz words in every meeting. Don’t show off your language skills all the time; you will only disgust your coworkers. Instead, give a glimpse of it every now and then. Learn to write crisp and clear emails that are to the point.
Dress well. Take tips from your close friends on what suits you and what don’t. Have a neat hairdo. Go for an exotic haircut, if you want, but make sure it is well maintained. Shave everyday, or at least every other day, and if you have a beard and moustache, make sure they are neatly trimmed. Look at photos of yourself and see what you can do to make your appearance more pleasing? Do you wear glasses that are straight out of a 70s movie? What about your shoes? Are they polished? You dont have to dress up like a celebrity, but you should look smart and sharp.
I cant speak much for women, but I have two pieces of advice. One, look at how other women at your work dress, and try to fit in. For example, if your coworkers are into jeans and tops, or western-style formals, don’t turn up everyday in salwar suits. You will stick out like a sore thumb. If you are not comfortable with contemporary fashion, go for chic ethnic dresses. Number two, never repeat your dresses in the same week, and never ever wear the same dress on consecutive days – even if you’ve washed them. This is true for the guys too.
10. Learn from failures
It’s okay to make mistakes, but it’s important you learn from them. Don’t always stick to the tried and tested. Instead, try out new ideas. Fear of failure is the most common factor that inhibits growth. Conquer it. Once you have failed and bounced back, you wont dread it anymore. In fact, it adds to your confidence, and you will enjoy living on the edge.
If you don’t believe me, just look at sports. Even the greatest athletes are not perfect. They have all lost games in their career. They have weaknesses that are exploited from time to time. But most importantly, they learn from their losses. And that what makes them great.
There are many other things you can do to get ahead, but if you must start somewhere, this is a pretty good place. Do leave a comment to let me know what you think.
Friday, April 27, 2007
Instructional Designer!!¿¿??
"An instructional designer.”
“A what?”
That’s what I get from 99 out of 100 people when I tell them what I do. I have to react quickly (not anymore actually, because I am now expecting that reaction) and say something funny like, “That’s just a glorified term for a corporate trainer.” My relief in conquering the awkward moment is often short-lived for I then hear, “I see. So what do you train on?”
That might seem an innocuous, and even legitimate, question for all those non-instructional designers reading this. But, if you are an instructional designer, you will know there’s no easy way to get out of that. So let me take this opportunity to explain what the hell an instructional designer does, so the next time an ignoramus mistakes me for an industrial designer, I will direct him to this blog.
Who is an instructional designer?
Put simply, an instructional designer creates effective trainings. By effective, I simply mean the training will achieve its goal. For example, if you want to train your employees on a quality process, the instructional designer’s job is to create an effective training program so your employees don’t walk out of the training looking dazed and drugged, but are actually ready to use the process.
What does an instructional designer train on?
Anything. Yes, the content, or “subject matter” as we call it, doesn’t matter. Instructional designers can be, and usually are, completely unfamiliar with the subject matter, but still create effective trainings. Of course, knowledge of the subject matter helps, but it is not a requirement to be a good instructional designer. How do we do it? Read on…
How can instructional designers create effective trainings without knowing anything about the subject matter?
Instructional designers collaborate with subject matter experts, or SMEs, to understand of the content. SMEs are content gurus. They know the content inside out; they eat, breathe and live it. They have seen everything there is to that content.
Why can’t the SMEs create the training themselves?
Sure they can. However, to develop effective training, you need to answer these questions: Why do you need this training? What are you training on? Who are you training? How are you training? How much should you train? Will the audience learn? Will the audience use what they learned back on the job? And so on. If you entrust the entire training responsibility to an SME, the only question that is usually answered is the “what” because that’s the SME’s forte. And content gurus that they are, SMEs often mistake content scope for effectiveness. That is to say, they succumb to the notion of “the more content we teach, the more effective the training”, which is not only untrue but also harmful.
In addition, there are other factors to consider. For example, the audience. If you a creating a training class on software programming, you need to understand how much your audience knows when they walk into the class. Similarly, the audience should know right at the beginning what they will learn in the class. This helps set their expectations and focus their thoughts. Considerations such as these and others are usually overlooked with the unfortunate result training branded as “ineffective”.
So, do instructional designers learn the content and then create the training?
No, instructional designers are primarily engaged in figuring out answers to the questions I listed above. They then rely on the SMEs to provide all the content. However, another important responsibility of an instructional designer is to review the content to make sure it is at a level that can be understood by the audience. A common trait of SMEs is to use jargons and acronyms, which may be every day terms for an expert but totally unfamiliar to the novice. And being an “outsider” to the content, a designer is ideally suited for this purpose. Then, there are learning strategies to consider such as: Should we include demonstrations? Should there be interactive exercises? And so on.
Why cannot the SME play be the instructional designer?
They most certainly can. In fact, many SMEs unknowingly address the questions I raised above, and often create trainings that are not only liked and appreciated by the training audience, but also prove effective from a performance and business standpoint. But remember, SMEs are content experts, and their interest lies in mastering the content area and exploring new aspects of it. Consequently, there is some resistance and reluctance when SMEs are asked to take up the training responsibility.
Should I hire an instructional designer every time I need to create training?
Not necessarily. On the contrary, for short trainings, it works best if the SME plays the role of the instructional designer. This expedites the training development, reduces development cost (because you only have one resource working), and eliminates any communication constraints. This approach is called rapid development where the SME uses off-the-shelf training development tools such as Adobe Captivate to quickly design a training program.
“A what?”
That’s what I get from 99 out of 100 people when I tell them what I do. I have to react quickly (not anymore actually, because I am now expecting that reaction) and say something funny like, “That’s just a glorified term for a corporate trainer.” My relief in conquering the awkward moment is often short-lived for I then hear, “I see. So what do you train on?”
That might seem an innocuous, and even legitimate, question for all those non-instructional designers reading this. But, if you are an instructional designer, you will know there’s no easy way to get out of that. So let me take this opportunity to explain what the hell an instructional designer does, so the next time an ignoramus mistakes me for an industrial designer, I will direct him to this blog.
Who is an instructional designer?
Put simply, an instructional designer creates effective trainings. By effective, I simply mean the training will achieve its goal. For example, if you want to train your employees on a quality process, the instructional designer’s job is to create an effective training program so your employees don’t walk out of the training looking dazed and drugged, but are actually ready to use the process.
What does an instructional designer train on?
Anything. Yes, the content, or “subject matter” as we call it, doesn’t matter. Instructional designers can be, and usually are, completely unfamiliar with the subject matter, but still create effective trainings. Of course, knowledge of the subject matter helps, but it is not a requirement to be a good instructional designer. How do we do it? Read on…
How can instructional designers create effective trainings without knowing anything about the subject matter?
Instructional designers collaborate with subject matter experts, or SMEs, to understand of the content. SMEs are content gurus. They know the content inside out; they eat, breathe and live it. They have seen everything there is to that content.
Why can’t the SMEs create the training themselves?
Sure they can. However, to develop effective training, you need to answer these questions: Why do you need this training? What are you training on? Who are you training? How are you training? How much should you train? Will the audience learn? Will the audience use what they learned back on the job? And so on. If you entrust the entire training responsibility to an SME, the only question that is usually answered is the “what” because that’s the SME’s forte. And content gurus that they are, SMEs often mistake content scope for effectiveness. That is to say, they succumb to the notion of “the more content we teach, the more effective the training”, which is not only untrue but also harmful.
In addition, there are other factors to consider. For example, the audience. If you a creating a training class on software programming, you need to understand how much your audience knows when they walk into the class. Similarly, the audience should know right at the beginning what they will learn in the class. This helps set their expectations and focus their thoughts. Considerations such as these and others are usually overlooked with the unfortunate result training branded as “ineffective”.
So, do instructional designers learn the content and then create the training?
No, instructional designers are primarily engaged in figuring out answers to the questions I listed above. They then rely on the SMEs to provide all the content. However, another important responsibility of an instructional designer is to review the content to make sure it is at a level that can be understood by the audience. A common trait of SMEs is to use jargons and acronyms, which may be every day terms for an expert but totally unfamiliar to the novice. And being an “outsider” to the content, a designer is ideally suited for this purpose. Then, there are learning strategies to consider such as: Should we include demonstrations? Should there be interactive exercises? And so on.
Why cannot the SME play be the instructional designer?
They most certainly can. In fact, many SMEs unknowingly address the questions I raised above, and often create trainings that are not only liked and appreciated by the training audience, but also prove effective from a performance and business standpoint. But remember, SMEs are content experts, and their interest lies in mastering the content area and exploring new aspects of it. Consequently, there is some resistance and reluctance when SMEs are asked to take up the training responsibility.
Should I hire an instructional designer every time I need to create training?
Not necessarily. On the contrary, for short trainings, it works best if the SME plays the role of the instructional designer. This expedites the training development, reduces development cost (because you only have one resource working), and eliminates any communication constraints. This approach is called rapid development where the SME uses off-the-shelf training development tools such as Adobe Captivate to quickly design a training program.
Thursday, April 26, 2007
India...10 years from now
These days, nothing written about about India, particularly in India, is complete without a mention of how India will beat China, sooner than later, in the race for global domination. There are some very valid underlying assumptions that lead business pundits to make these conclusions. But, several others are ignored, ones that could compound over the years and negate everything we have achieved so far.Almost everyone agrees the present trend of growth driven by capitalism started with the economic reforms in 1991. Which means, we are new to economic growth, still learning how to sustain it, and not even close to figuring out how to do it right. For now, we are trying our best to emulate the developed nations. In other words, we are playing catch up, and nothing wrong with that. So long as we realize this is lap 2 of a 50 lap race and we should try and sustain the momentum rather than go all out.But, there are so many opportunities for growth, you say? Why not whiz past the competition to the checkered flag? Well, the prosperity experienced by India is a direct and sole consequence of the IT boom. And if you ask me, the IT boom was one of the most fortunate accidents that ever happened to a nation. Think abou this: What have we done to deserve the benefits of the boom? Our English language skills, the main reason why India is such a lucrative offshore destination, are the legacy of the British, yes, the same ones who we so proudly drove out of our country. Sure, we had enterprizing young men who foresaw the opportunity and mobilized millions of middle-class English-speaking graduates from factories and warehouses into air-conditioned offices, but even after being involved in the IT revolution for a decade now, we are yet to invent a single IT product or software. The only area where our creativity has shown results is in our ingenuity to develop new ways of propagating piracy.
Let's do a reality check here. Our infrastructure: deplorable; education system: miserable; political and bureaucratic structure: rotten; social values: outdated; health care: nonexistent; law and order: unreliable. It is pretty clear the current economic growth is despite these ills, and not because of them. And that's the big difference. These factors are the cornerstones of sustainable longterm prosperity, and if you look at the ten most developed or richest countries in the world, you will see each of these factors is actively supports and sustains, barring the political system, of course, which has its own ways. The question, then, is what is India doing to change this situation? The answer is painfully obvious: nothing.
Plans to make Mumbai a Shanghai have been on paper for years now and by the time it gets approved, the plan will already be outdated. The decision to privatize Delhi and Mumbai airports was met with staunch opposition that raised an unbearable stench, but thankfully, sense prevailed. Most of India still uses the railways as the primary mode of travel, and despite the stellar financial figures, the railways is in a terrible condition. Can you imagine the ensuing outburst if the government were to privatize railways? The recent boom in the domestic airline travel might indicate prosperity, but our airports are badly equipped to handle existing flight traffic, let alone future increases. And what about our reliance on oil? Thanks to the auto boom, our consumption of oil keeps rising, but what is our contigency plan if a crisis were to erupt in the middle east? When Ahmedijinad may use the bomb is anyone's guess. Some more signs of an impending disaster:
1. Nandigram. No due diligence was done before identifying a SEZ that underlines the incompetency of our governments, and the over-reaction to the incident shows our outdated thinking.
2. Walmart. The central Government opposes Walmart's entry because the retail giant might put several middlemen and distributors out of work. Certainly, a sizeable percentage of the population, but what about the millions of consumers and farmers who will stand to gain from lowered prices and efficient supply chains? And even worse, why stop Walmart, but not Reliance which has exactly the same plans?
3. Political structure. Murli Manohar Joshi created a ruckus by reducing fees at IIMs to 20,000 and now it's Arjun Singh's turn to make some noise by announcing new quotas. These moves only manage to jeopardize the future of thousands of students, some of whom might be the next Jack Welch or Narayana Murthy.
So where are we headed? I can see these social and political ills closing in on the economic growth we are having. We already have a big divide in the economic power of urban and rural India. Without radical social and political changes, this divide will widen further, and could lead to an economic debacle like the one we witnessed in Indonesia and Argentina. Even worse, such a situation could perpetuate political chaos and unrest, and the clock on our progress will be turned back by 50 years.
Having said that, I recently read a book called Moral Consequences of Economic Growth by Benjamin Friedman, where the author promotes the view that economic prosperity will lead to social and moral progress. He backs this up with several well-researched and nicely articulated examples. Let's all pray the current economic growth will continue despite the ills, and consequently rid us of these.
Let's do a reality check here. Our infrastructure: deplorable; education system: miserable; political and bureaucratic structure: rotten; social values: outdated; health care: nonexistent; law and order: unreliable. It is pretty clear the current economic growth is despite these ills, and not because of them. And that's the big difference. These factors are the cornerstones of sustainable longterm prosperity, and if you look at the ten most developed or richest countries in the world, you will see each of these factors is actively supports and sustains, barring the political system, of course, which has its own ways. The question, then, is what is India doing to change this situation? The answer is painfully obvious: nothing.
Plans to make Mumbai a Shanghai have been on paper for years now and by the time it gets approved, the plan will already be outdated. The decision to privatize Delhi and Mumbai airports was met with staunch opposition that raised an unbearable stench, but thankfully, sense prevailed. Most of India still uses the railways as the primary mode of travel, and despite the stellar financial figures, the railways is in a terrible condition. Can you imagine the ensuing outburst if the government were to privatize railways? The recent boom in the domestic airline travel might indicate prosperity, but our airports are badly equipped to handle existing flight traffic, let alone future increases. And what about our reliance on oil? Thanks to the auto boom, our consumption of oil keeps rising, but what is our contigency plan if a crisis were to erupt in the middle east? When Ahmedijinad may use the bomb is anyone's guess. Some more signs of an impending disaster:
1. Nandigram. No due diligence was done before identifying a SEZ that underlines the incompetency of our governments, and the over-reaction to the incident shows our outdated thinking.
2. Walmart. The central Government opposes Walmart's entry because the retail giant might put several middlemen and distributors out of work. Certainly, a sizeable percentage of the population, but what about the millions of consumers and farmers who will stand to gain from lowered prices and efficient supply chains? And even worse, why stop Walmart, but not Reliance which has exactly the same plans?
3. Political structure. Murli Manohar Joshi created a ruckus by reducing fees at IIMs to 20,000 and now it's Arjun Singh's turn to make some noise by announcing new quotas. These moves only manage to jeopardize the future of thousands of students, some of whom might be the next Jack Welch or Narayana Murthy.
So where are we headed? I can see these social and political ills closing in on the economic growth we are having. We already have a big divide in the economic power of urban and rural India. Without radical social and political changes, this divide will widen further, and could lead to an economic debacle like the one we witnessed in Indonesia and Argentina. Even worse, such a situation could perpetuate political chaos and unrest, and the clock on our progress will be turned back by 50 years.
Having said that, I recently read a book called Moral Consequences of Economic Growth by Benjamin Friedman, where the author promotes the view that economic prosperity will lead to social and moral progress. He backs this up with several well-researched and nicely articulated examples. Let's all pray the current economic growth will continue despite the ills, and consequently rid us of these.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)